Mary
Poppins, this time in the form of Emily Blunt, has returned to Number 17,
Cherry Tree Lane in London. Is the film a successful sequel to its legendary
original? Well... yes and no. Sequels are nearly always difficult. The one film
exception I can think of is “The Godfather II,” which outdid the original.
(“Godfather III” did not.). This sequel in no way outdoes the original, but it
does have its moments, and among the most successful ones are those involving
Lin-Manuel Miranda, who clearly has star power the likes of which we have not
seen since the hey-day of Gene Kelly. I suppose I am one of the last to
acknowledge this, not being one of the thousands of “Hamilton” groupies, but the
man clearly has extraordinary talent and puts it to superb use, perhaps at an
advantage in not having to try to bring the original Dick Van Dyke character,
Bert, the chimney sweep, back to life.
Emily
Blunt, in my opinion, is not so lucky. Yes, she captures the Mary Poppins role
satisfactorily, but she is no substitute for Julie Andrews. This is not to say
she does not sing, dance and act well, but she does not bring that certain
indefinable “something” to the character that Andrews did. I would go so far as
to say that no one can. Andrews’ grasp of Poppins was, like her Maria von Trapp
in “The Sound of Music,” a definitive interpretation, and one that another
actress takes on at her peril. Mary Poppins does not have a range of
characteristics like, say, Shakespeare’s Juliet—she is basically what we call
in fiction a”flat” character, yes a very odd bird indeed, but even her oddities
are relatively limited in scope. Andrews brought the character of Poppins
totally to life, in that she was not playing a role—she WAS the character.
All
this being said, the rest of the cast was quite superb, as were the musical
numbers and production values in general. I would not agree with the New York
Times review, which found the show “charmless.” It had plenty of charm and most
of the elements that made the first MP a success. “The Place Where Lost Things
Go” was
a lovely, touching number, and “Trip the Light Fantastic” a terrific dance sequence. Cameos played by Meryl Streep, Angela Lansbury, Dick van Dyke and
others were delightful and effective—only Colin Firth, in a stereotypical
villain role, was wasted.
- No, I didn’t come out dancing and singing, as I did some fifty-four years ago, when I saw the original film, but I’m very glad I saw it.
Now let’s wait and see what our Real Film Critic, Chance Crane, has to say!
No comments:
Post a Comment